Postgrad Med J

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Postgraduate Medical Journal 2008;84:225-227; doi:10.1136/sti.2007.027748
Copyright © 2008 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boulle, A
Right arrow Articles by Ford, N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boulle, A
Right arrow Articles by Ford, N

EDITORIAL

Scaling up antiretroviral therapy in developing countries: what are the benefits and challenges?

A Boulle 1, N Ford 2

1 University of Cape Town, South Africa
2 Médicins San Frontières, South Africa

Correspondence to:
A Boulle, University of Cape Town, PO Box 13203 Mowbray, South Africa; andrew.boulle@uct.ac.za


Accepted 2 October 2007

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In recent years the case for antiretroviral therapy (ART) in those countries hardest hit by the HIV pandemic is seldom contested. Prior to the widespread availability of antiretroviral therapy in many developing countries, there were however frequent concerns expressed about the safety and feasibility of promoting widespread access to ART in countries such as those in Southern Africa. These concerns were premised on the potential "anarchy" that might be the result of weak health systems leading to widespread virological resistance,1 2 on the grounds that there were more cost-effective interventions available given the limited funding baskets at the time,3 and on the potential to do more harm than good if introducing large and complex new interventions into already weak and fragmented health systems, further increasing inequities.4 5

The first public-sector ART treatment programmes in developing countries (with the exception of Brazil) date back to 2000,6 and data are now emerging on the . . . [Full text of this article]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine