Postgrad Med J

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Postgraduate Medical Journal 2007;83:504-506; doi:10.1136/pgmj.2007.058982
Copyright © 2007 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson, T. J
Right arrow Articles by Wade, W. B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson, T. J
Right arrow Articles by Wade, W. B

PERSONAL VIEW

Workplace based assessment

Problems with using a supervisor’s report as a form of summative assessment

Tim J Wilkinson 1, Winnie B Wade 2

1 Christchurch School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, and Royal Australasian College of Physicians, New Zealand
2 Royal College of Physicians, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor Tim J Wilkinson
Christchurch School of Medicine and Health Sciences, C/- The Princess Margaret Hospital, PO Box 800, Christchurch, New Zealand; tim.wilkinson@chmeds.ac.nz


The place of a supervisor report when used as a summative assessment of clinical workplace based learning is discussed

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Within clinical medicine, the apprenticeship model is traditional, and highly valued. It relies on a close relationship between a supervisor and a trainee. When it comes to assessing the trainee, who better to ask than the supervisor? On the face of it, this approach makes good sense and has contributed to formalising ways of seeking such an opinion. As one source of feedback, such an opinion is highly valuable. In recent times, though, such reports are now being increasingly used as a form of summative assessment—that is, the basis on which decisions about the trainee’s progress are made. This practice relies on the assumption that such a report is always a valid and reliable assessment method. We wish to challenge this assumption. This paper aims to distil and explain the fundamental flaws of this type of assessment, and offers an alternative solution that not only aids learning, . . . [Full text of this article]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine