Postgrad Med J

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, L J
Right arrow Articles by Lilburne, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, L J
Right arrow Articles by Lilburne, C
Postgraduate Medical Journal 2003;79:303-305
© 2003 Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine


EDITORIAL

Commission for Health Improvement

What is the Commission for Health Improvement?

L J Patterson , C Lilburne

Commission for Health Improvement, 1st Floor, Finsbury Tower, 103–105 Bunhill Row, London EC1Y 8TG, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
C Lilburne;
Creina.Lilburne@chi.nhs.uk


An important part of the government’s programme to modernise the NHS

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The Commission for Health Improvement (CHI) was set up by the 1999 Health Act to perform four core functions: to review the clinical governance* arrangements in every NHS organisation in England and Wales; to review and monitor implementation of national service frameworks in partnership with the Audit Commission; to carry out investigations of NHS health providers where suspected serious service failings had occurred; and to issue advice and information. CHI is not a standard setting body, nor is it likely to become one. Rather, it looks to assess how well the NHS is measuring up to the standards that already exist within the health service and whether trusts have the processes and systems in place to meet those standards within a patient focused agenda.

The setting up of CHI was part of a shift away from measuring performance strictly on the basis of financial and activity . . . [Full text of this article]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine