Postgrad Med J

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Larner, A J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Larner, A J
Postgraduate Medical Journal 2002;78:106
© 2002 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine


SELF ASSESSMENT QUESTION

Visual field defect

A developing visual field defect

A J Larner

Walton Centre for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Lower Lane, Fazakerley, Liverpool L9 7LJ, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Larner;
larner-a@wcnn-tr.nwest.nhs.uk

Submitted 20 November 2000
Accepted 15 February 2001


Answers on p 112.

Keywords: visual field defect; pituitary prolactinoma

A 53 year old man complained of intermittent blurring of vision confined to the left eye over a period of 12 months. It did not stop him from reading or driving. There was no history of visual loss, eye pain, or double vision. He had recently been diagnosed with hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia, for which he was treated with felodipine (5 mg once daily) and fluvastatin (40 mg once daily) respectively.

He attended his optician who performed a visual field test (suprathreshold static perimetry, fig 1Go), on the basis of which referral to a neurologist was recommended.


Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Visual fields mapped with suprathreshold static perimetry.

 
Clinical examination showed an uncorrected visual acuity of 6/9 left, 6/6 right. Reading pseudoisochromatic (Ishihara) plates he scored 2/17 left, 14/17 right. Confrontation testing of the visual fields showed no field loss to stationary or moving targets, but a red pin appeared less . . . [Full text of this article]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2002 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine