Postgrad Med J

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abbas, M A M.
Right arrow Articles by Rashid, W
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Abbas, M A M.
Right arrow Articles by Rashid, W
Postgraduate Medical Journal 2002;78:54
© 2002 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine


SELF ASSESSMENT QUESTION

Occlusive vasculitis

Recurrent orogenital ulcers with papilloedema and headaches

M A Mahyoub Abbas , R Cotta , W Rashid

Conquest Hospital, Hastings, Sussex, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr M A Mahyoub Abbas, Department of Radiology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, UK;
maf.abbas@doctors.org.uk

Submitted 1 June 1999
Accepted 2 October 2000


Answers on p 57.

A 33 year old man with a past history of recurrent orogenital ulcers, generalised arthritis, eye inflammation, and an episode of deep vein thrombosis presented with a three day history of worsening headaches not responding to simple analgesia.

On examination he was pyrexial with a temperature of 38°C. Neurological examination showed no signs of meningism or any focal neurological deficit, but fundus examination showed papilloedema. Other systemic examinations were unremarkable.

Initial investigations including full blood count, urea and electrolytes, chest radiography, and urinalysis were normal. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate was 15 mm/hour and C reactive protein was less than 7 mg/l. In view of the fundal findings and headaches, the patient had unenhanced computed tomography of his brain (see fig 1Go).


Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)
View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Unenhanced computed tomogram of brain.

 

QUESTIONS
(1) What is the initial diagnosis?

(2) What does the unenhanced computed tomogram of the brain show?

(3) What probable complication of . . . [Full text of this article]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2002 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine