Postgrad Med J

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chitturi, S
Right arrow Articles by George, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chitturi, S
Right arrow Articles by George, J
Postgrad Med J 2001;77:602 ( September )

Self assessment questions

Answers on p 608.

Abdominal pain in an intrauterine contraceptive device user

S Chitturia, J Huia, E Salisburyb, D Mitchellc, J Georgea

a University of Sydney at Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia: Storr Liver Unit, b Department of Anatomical Pathology, c Department of Infectious Diseases

Correspondence to: Dr S Chitturi, Storr Liver Unit, Westmead Hospital, NSW 2145, Australia sumibob@hotmail.com

Submitted 21 February 2000; Accepted 22 June 2000

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

A 41 year old shop assistant was admitted with a seven week history of colicky lower abdominal pain associated with alternating constipation and diarrhoea. In the preceding three weeks, she had experienced night sweats and had lost 5 kg in weight. The patient was not taking any regular medication apart from steroid inhalers for mild asthma. Her periods were regular with no abnormal vaginal bleeding. She had recently developed a creamy white vaginal discharge, which had not been evaluated. The last menstrual period was three weeks before admission but a recent pregnancy test was negative. The obstetric history was gravida 5, para 3. An intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) had been inserted five years before.

Examination revealed a thin, emaciated women distressed by pain. She was afebrile and the vital signs were within normal limits. Mild suprapubic tenderness was noted on palpation. No organomegaly was discernable. Vaginal and rectal examination were normal. The laboratory findings . . . [Full text of this article]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2001 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine