Postgrad Med J

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Driscoll, D
Right arrow Articles by Duddy, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Driscoll, D
Right arrow Articles by Duddy, M
Postgrad Med J 1999;75:557-559 ( September )

Self-assessment questions

The uncommon denominator

D O'Driscoll, M Duddy

Department of Radiology, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Selly Oak Hospital, Birmingham, West Midlands, UK

Correspondence to: D O'Driscoll, Cambridge & Huntingdon Breast Screening Centre, The Rosie Hospital, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 2SW, UK

Accepted 14 January 1999

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

    Introduction

A 70-year-old man presented with anorexia, altered bowel habit and weight loss. He had a history of heart failure and rheumatoid arthritis. Clinical examination showed rheumatoid deformity and pedal oedema. Laboratory investigations demonstrated microcytic anaemia, eosinophilia and hypoalbuminaemia. Barium enema and contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT) were performed (figures 1 and 2, respectively).

Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)

Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)


    Questions


1 What are the radiological signs on figures 1 and 2 ?
2 What is the differential diagnosis for each ?
3 Are there any common denominators ?


    Answers

QUESTION 1
The barium enema (figure 1) shows loss of the normal haustral pattern and the mucosa appears granular. There is widening of the presacral space (A). The bladder, opacified by prior CT enhancement, is narrowed and elongated (B). On the CT scan (figure 2), the intra-abdominal fat is of similar attenuation to the water density of a simple right renal cyst. The mesenteric and pararenal fat has a misty appearance with thickening of Gerota's fascia.

QUESTION 2
The differential diagnosis for the CT appearances is summarised in box 1.1 The differential diagnosis . . . [Full text of this article]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 1999 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine