Postgrad Med J

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Postgraduate Medical Journal 2007;83:610-611; doi:10.1136/pgmj.2007.059097
Copyright © 2007 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jose, R.
Right arrow Articles by Clesham, G. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jose, R.
Right arrow Articles by Clesham, G. J

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Survey of the use of epinephrine (adrenaline) for anaphylaxis by junior hospital doctors

Ricardo Jose , Gerald J Clesham

Department of Medicine, Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Ricardo Jose
Broomfield Hospital, Court Road, Chelmsford CM1 7ET, UK; rjpj{at}ananzi.co.za

Background: Anaphylaxis is a life threatening reaction where prompt and appropriate management can save lives. Epinephrine (adrenaline) is the treatment of choice; however, the recommended dose and route of administration of epinephrine used in the management of anaphylaxis is different from that used in the management of cardiac arrest.

Objective: To investigate how junior doctors would administer epinephrine in a case of anaphylactic shock in an adult patient.

Methods: Junior medical staff in two district general hospitals were assessed with a short questionnaire.

Results: 95 junior hospital doctors were assessed. The majority (94%) would administer epinephrine as the life saving drug of choice, but only 16.8% would administer it as recommended by the UK Resuscitation Council Guidelines.

Conclusion: Junior doctors may be called to make immediate management decisions in patients with anaphylaxis; however, widespread confusion exists regarding the dose and route of administration of epinephrine. Strategies to improve education and access to appropriate drugs are needed. A labelled "anaphylaxis box" on every resuscitation trolley, containing the dose of epinephrine with clear labelling for intramuscular use, may be one solution.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine