HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Read responses to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Burke, F. D Articles by Dubin, N. H Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Burke, F. D Articles by Dubin, N. H

Primary care management of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome referred to surgeons: are non-operative interventions effectively utilised?

¹ The Pulvertaft Hand Centre, Derbyshire Royal Infirmary, Derby, UK
² The Curtis National Hand Center, Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Shaw Wilgis
c/o Anne Rupert Mattson, Editor, Curtis National Hand Center, Union Memorial Hospital, 3333 N. Calvert Street, #400, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA; anne.mattson{at}medstar.net

Aim: To investigate the non-operative primary care management (splintage, task modification advice, steroid injections and oral medications) of carpal tunnel syndrome before patients were referred to a hand surgeon for decompression.

Design and setting: Preoperative data were obtained on age, gender, body mass index, employment, symptom duration, and preoperative clinical stage for patients undergoing carpal tunnel decompression (263 in the USA, 227 in the UK).

Results: Primary care physicians made relatively poor use of beneficial treatment options with the exception of splintage in the US (73% of cases compared with 22.8% in the UK). Steroid injections were used in only 22.6% (US) and 9.8% (UK) of cases. Task modification advice was almost never given. Oral medication was employed in 18.8% of US cases and 8.9% of UK cases.

Conclusions: This study analyses the non-operative modalities available and suggests that there is scope for more effective use of non-operative treatment before referral for carpal tunnel decompression.