Postgrad Med J

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Postgraduate Medical Journal 2007;83:473-477; doi:10.1136/pgmj.2006.050534
Copyright © 2007 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wildfire, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gazzard, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wildfire, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gazzard, B.

ETHICOLEGAL ISSUES

Rights theory in a specific healthcare context: "Speaking ill of the dead"

Adrian Wildfire , Justin Stebbing , Brian Gazzard

The Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, Division of Investigative Science, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Adrian Wildfire
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, HIV/GUM Research Laboratory, 5th Floor, St Stephen’s Centre, 369 Fulham Road, London SW10 9NH, UK; adrian.wildfire{at}chelwest.nhs.uk


ABSTRACT
Generally physicians have a legal and ethical obligation of keeping confidentiality regarding their communication with patients and it is clear that we all have rights. The application of rights theorem, which usually refers to the recognition of individual human rights, to the deceased offers possible answers to the problematic question of patient confidentiality after death. Philosophical considerations broadly support utilitarian ideals concerning the ‘common good’. However, it may be possible to rank rights according to a hierarchy of need and thus preserve individual rights where they do not impinge upon the publics’ right to protection from harm and the physician’s right to tell the truth. This has broad implications for confidentiality, anonymity and health care information in general for patients, their families and healthcare workers. We discuss these issues, with specific reference to an individual case.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine