Postgrad Med J

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Postgraduate Medical Journal 2006;82:615-618; doi:10.1136/pgmj.2006.046789
Copyright © 2006 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chow, K M
Right arrow Articles by Szeto, C C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chow, K M
Right arrow Articles by Szeto, C C

CLINICAL AUDIT

Secular trends in the medical discharge summary in an acute medical hospital

K M Chow , C C Szeto

Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong, SAR, China

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr K M Chow
Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong; Chow_Kai_Ming{at}alumni.cuhk.net

Background: Although recent research has reported an evolution in the level of medical care, little is known about secular trends in the medical discharge summary.

Methods: The audit evaluated the evolution of discharge summary abstract over a decade in an acute medicine hospital among three successive periods of 1994, 2000, and 2005.

Results: Of the 140 random samples of discharge summaries, significant between-cohort difference existed in the logarithm transformed length of discharge summary; the median length of discharge summary increased from 11 lines in 1994 to 26 lines in 2005 (p<0.001 corrected for multiple comparison). The closest univariate associations of discharge summary length were positively with the year of hospitalisation, length of stay, length of wordings about discharge plan and duplication of previous discharge summary, and negatively with clinical or planned admission (all p<0.01). In a multiple linear regression analysis, the year of patient admission correlated significantly with the length of discharge summary (p<0.001).

Conclusions: Over the 10 year study period, significant secular trends were seen in the discharge summary length and discharge plan documentation. The causes and implications for these trends deserve further investigation.


Keywords: discharge summary; hospital notes; audit; medical record; quality improvement







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine