Postgrad Med J

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Postgraduate Medical Journal 2006;82:602-606; doi:10.1136/pgmj.2005.044255
Copyright © 2006 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shenoy, V V
Right arrow Articles by Juvale, N I
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shenoy, V V
Right arrow Articles by Juvale, N I

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Pulmonary leptospirosis: an excellent response to bolus methylprednisolone

V V Shenoy , V S Nagar , A A Chowdhury , P S Bhalgat , N I Juvale

Medical Intensive Care Unit and Department of Internal Medicine, Grant Medical College and Sir J J Group of Hospitals, Byculla, Mumbai, India

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr V S Nagar
4/29, Swastik, J J Hospital Campus, Byculla 400008, India; vidyaic{at}vsnl.net

Background: This case series analyses the beneficial effect of methylprednisolone in pulmonary leptospirosis, which usually has an aggressive course and grave outcome.

Methods: 30 patients of pulmonary leptospirosis were evaluated. The initial 13 patients did not receive corticosteroids while the remaining 17 all received bolus methylprednisolone one gram intravenously for three days followed by oral prednisolone 1 mg/kg for seven days, on the basis of occasional case reports of benefit in pulmonary leptospirosis. APACHE III and lung injury scores of similar severity were considered while comparing outcomes in those who received methylprednisolone with those who did not.

Results: Dyspnoea and haemoptysis were the commonest symptoms in those with pulmonary manifestations. Overall mortality was 18% (3 of 17) in patients who received methylprednisolone, as compared with 62% (8 of 13 patients) in those who did not (p<0.02). In patients with established acute lung injury (ALI score >2.5), five of eight patients survived in the subgroup with corticosteroids (37% mortality) while only one of nine patients survived in the group that did not receive corticosteroids (89% mortality). Corticosteroids affected outcome only if given within the first 12 hours after the onset of pulmonary manifestations. Mortality seemed to correlate with the APACHE scores, and number of quadrants affected on chest radiographs, more than with blood gas pressures.

Conclusions: Corticosteroids reduce mortality and change outcome significantly when used early in the management of pulmonary leptospirosis.


Keywords: pulmonary leptospirosis; acute lung injury; corticosteroids; methylprednisolone







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine