Postgrad Med J

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Postgraduate Medical Journal 2006;82:520-523; doi:10.1136/pgmj.2005.042036
Copyright © 2006 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Read responses to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greene, S L
Right arrow Articles by Jones, A L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Greene, S L
Right arrow Articles by Jones, A L

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Paracetamol availability and recent changes in paracetamol poisoning: is the 1998 legislation limiting availability of paracetamol being followed?

S L Greene 1, P I Dargan 1, P Leman 2, A L Jones 1

1 Guy’s and St Thomas’s Poisons Unit, Guys and St Thomas’s NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
2 Emergency Department, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr S L Greene
Guy’s and St Thomas’s Poisons Unit, Avonley Road, New Cross, London SE14 5ER UK; Shaun.Greene{at}gstt.nhs.uk

Objective: To determine the degree of adherence to legislation introduced in 1998 restricting the availability of over the counter paracetamol.

Design: A prospective observational study.

Setting: An emergency department in an inner city London teaching hospital. Pharmacy and non-pharmacy outlets in south London.

Main outcome measures: (1) The source of paracetamol ingested by 107 patients presenting with an acute paracetamol overdose (2001–2003) and (2) the ability to purchase paracetamol from pharmacy and non-pharmacy outlets in a manner contravening paracetamol pack size legislation (2004).

Results: Potentially toxic amounts of paracetamol in excess of pack size restrictions were purchased in 70% (17 of 24) of outlets. Forty six per cent of patients who had ingested a potentially toxic dose of paracetamol obtained the tablets in a manner contravening the 1998 legislation.

Conclusion: Legislation limiting the availability of over the counter paracetamol is not being adhered to in south London. A significant number of patients ingesting a potentially toxic dose of paracetamol report purchasing the tablets in a manner contravening the legislation. Studies that attempt to assess the impact of the legislation need to be interpreted in the context of these results. Measures to enforce current legislation may help to reduce the severity of paracetamol poisoning in the UK.


Keywords: legislation; paracetamol; pack size; overdose




eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Authors' comment
Dr Shaun L Greene, et al.
Postgrad Med J Online, 7 Aug 2006 [Full text]
Re: Article relating to Paracetamol in the Postgraduate Medical Journal (2006; 82:520)
Priya R Sejpal
Postgrad Med J Online, 1 Nov 2006 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine