Postgrad Med J

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Postgraduate Medical Journal 2005;81:657-659; doi:10.1136/pgmj.2004.030254
Copyright © 2005 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malhi, A M
Right arrow Articles by Khan, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Malhi, A M
Right arrow Articles by Khan, R

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Correlation between clinical diagnosis and arthroscopic findings of the shoulder

A M Malhi , R Khan

Department of Orthopaedics, Ravenscourt Park Hospital, Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
MrA M Malhi
40 Wadham Gardens, Greenford, Middlesex UB6 0BP, UK; amalhi{at}doctors.org.uk

Objective: To assess the accuracy of clinical examination by non-specialist orthopaedic surgeons of patients presenting to a diagnostic and treatment centre (DTC) for arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

Methods: A retrospective review of notes of 130 consecutive shoulder arthroscopies performed at a DTC over a 10 month period. Preoperative clinical diagnosis was compared with operative arthroscopic findings. Additional information from preoperative imaging was compared with clinical examination and arthroscopic findings. Preoperative clinical examinations and consent were undertaken by clinical fellows, (SpR level) and non-upper limb consultant orthopaedic surgeons. Consultants specialising in upper limb surgery performed the operations.

Results: Six main groups were identified on the basis of clinical examination: impingement 76 cases (58%), instability 22 cases (17%), frozen shoulder 11 cases (8%), rotator cuff tear four cases (3%), non-specific pain eight cases (6%), and normal clinical examination nine cases (7%). Impingement and instability diagnosed clinically strongly correlated with the arthroscopic findings. Clinical diagnosis of frozen shoulder and rotator cuff tears had a weaker correlation with the arthroscopic findings. Of the nine cases of normal clinical examination, abnormality was found at arthroscopy in all cases.

Conclusion: There have been very few studies comparing clinical examination of the shoulder with arthroscopic findings. This study emphasises the importance of good clinical examination skills in diagnosing common shoulder abnormalities. The addition of imaging, particularly ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging further increases the likelihood of an accurate diagnosis. Shoulder examination should be taught with as much emphasis at both undergraduate and postgraduate level as other orthopaedic clinical examinations.


Abbreviations: DTC, diagnostic and treatment centre; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; US, ultrasound; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value

Keywords: shoulder; arthroscopy; clinical; examination




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
Diagnosis of shoulder complaints requires better clinical examination skills
Ann Rheum Dis, February 1, 2006; 65(2): 156 - 156.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine