Postgrad Med J

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hogh, L
Right arrow Articles by Ward, M C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hogh, L
Right arrow Articles by Ward, M C
Postgraduate Medical Journal 2005;81:409-410
© 2005 Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine


SHORT REPORT

Variations in the provision of resuscitation equipment: survey of acute hospitals

L Hogh , I Kane , A Bhalla , M C Ward

Department of Geriatric Medicine, St Helier Hospital, Carshalton, Surrey, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr A Bhalla
Department of Geriatric Medicine, St Helier Hospital, Wrythe Lane, Carshalton, Surrey SM5 1AA, UK; abhalla{at}sghms.ac.uk

Background: There are wide variations in survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The aim of this survey was to describe how equipment provision of resuscitation trolleys was deployed in a range of clinical ward areas.

Methods: The equipment in randomly selected resuscitation trolleys in all 14 South West Thames Region hospitals was surveyed. The gold standard for equipment provision was referenced from the document CPR Guidance for Clinical Practice and Training in Hospital.

Results: There were significant differences in the provision of circulation equipment (p = 0.004) and in the rates of drug items present (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in provision of airways equipment (p = 0.24) or immediate access items (p = 0.55).

Conclusions: There are variations in the provision of resuscitation equipment in many clinical areas. Hospitals need to review the procedures for ensuring adequate provision of resuscitation equipment in all clinical areas.


Abbreviations: A&E, accident and emergency; CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; CCU, coronary care unit

Keywords: resuscitation; cardiac arrest; hospitals







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine