HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Leslie, S J Articles by Denvir, M A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Leslie, S J Articles by Denvir, M A

Management of chronic heart failure: perceived needs of general practitioners in light of the new general medical services contract

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr S J Leslie
Department of Cardiology, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK; s.j.leslie{at}ed.ac.uk

Background: Despite the existence of several chronic heart failure (CHF) guidelines the treatment of patients with CHF is suboptimal. The new general medical services (GMS) contract in primary care has only three specific performance indicators for patients with left ventricular dysfunction. The aim of this current questionnaire survey was to assess the views of general practitioners (GPs) on CHF treatments and services in light of the new GMS contract.

Methods and Results: All local GPs (717) were sent a questionnaire. Fifty three per cent were returned. Forty five per cent of GPs had access to a community CHF nurse. Having read a national guideline (SIGN) and having the support of a CHF nurse did not seem to affect the knowledge of GPs in terms of perceived benefits of drug treatments. GPs with access to a specialist CHF nurse service attached more importance to it than those with no specialist nurse (p = 0.003).

Conclusions: Most GPs were aware of the existence of a national guideline but many had not read it. There was little or no difference in the knowledge level for various evidence based treatments between GPs who had or had not read the guideline suggesting that reading guidelines may not be a key factor in determining knowledge. Support for a specialist CHF nurse was higher among GPs who already had this service, suggesting that this service is valued. The new GMS contract may improve identification and diagnosis of patients with CHF but there is a danger that it may fall short of ensuring optimal treatment for patients with CHF.

Abbreviations: CHF, chronic heart failure; GP, general practitioner; GMS, general medical services; ACEI, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; LHCC, local health care cooperative

Keywords: heart failure; questionnaire; primary care

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. J. Remme, J. J.V. McMurray, F.D. R. Hobbs, A. Cohen-Solal, J. Lopez-Sendon, A. Boccanelli, F. Zannad, B. Rauch, K. Keukelaar, C. Macarie, et al. Awareness and perception of heart failure among European cardiologists, internists, geriatricians, and primary care physicians Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2008; 29(14): 1739 - 1752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Denvir and S. J. Leslie Best practice for chronic heart failure patients--writing guidelines is not enough Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2008; 29(14): 1706 - 1708. [Full Text] [PDF]