Postgrad Med J

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, A G
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, J D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, A G
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, J D
Postgraduate Medical Journal 2005;81:188-190
© 2005 Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Informed consent in renal transplantation

A G Edwards , A R Weale , J D Morgan

Department of Surgery, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
MissA Edwards
Department of Surgery, Southmead Hospital, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK; dr_ag_edwards{at}yahoo.com

Purpose: This study was performed to assess how well completed the new consent forms are for patients undergoing renal transplantation.

Methodology: 100 patients were randomly selected from the 160 who had a renal transplantation, at a single centre in the UK, over an 18 month period. The notes were located and the consent forms scrutinised.

Findings: Seven sets of notes could not be traced and 10 did not contain a relevant consent form. Forty eight per cent of completed forms mentioned the source of organ while 8% mentioned on which side the operation was to be performed. Twelve risks and complications were identified as being relevant to this procedure but no single form mentioned all 12. In most cases a senior member of the surgical team obtained consent.

Implications: The demonstrated variability in the amount of detail on consent forms lends weight to the call for the use of procedure specific forms. While such variability does not necessarily equate with not gaining valid, informed consent, this form, at present, serves as the only record of what has been discussed with the patient. These findings should encourage all surgeons to complete the forms themselves, be as detailed as possible, and ensure that the form is filed in the patients’ notes.


Keywords: consent form; informed consent; renal transplantation; surgery







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine