Postgrad Med J

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Norwood, M G A
Right arrow Articles by Sayers, R D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Norwood, M G A
Right arrow Articles by Sayers, R D
Postgraduate Medical Journal 2004;80:478-480
© 2004 Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Evaluation of the role of a specialist tracheostomy service. From critical care to outreach and beyond

M G A Norwood 1, P Spiers 2, J Bailiss 2, R D Sayers 3

1 University of Leicester Department of Surgery, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK
2 Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK
3 Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Mr M G A Norwood
Department of Surgery, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK; drmikenorwood{at}hotmail.com

The impact that a new specialist tracheostomy service, designed specifically for the care of patients with tracheostomies, was assessed in terms of type of tracheostomy tube used, time to first tube change, time to decannulation, and incidence of tracheostomy related complications in a teaching hospital with no on-site ear, nose, and throat facility. A total of 170 patients were studied. After service implementation, fewer patients (17.6%, n = 21) were discharged from the intensive treatment unit to the wards with tracheostomy tubes compared with the first group (39%, n = 20) (p = 0.006), and the number of tracheostomy related complications on the wards were significantly reduced (p = 0.031).


Keywords: tracheostomy; critical care; outreach




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AJSLPHome page
E. Ward, E. Agius, M. Solley, P. Cornwell, and C. Jones
Preparation, Clinical Support, and Confidence of Speech-Language Pathologists Managing Clients With a Tracheostomy in Australia
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, August 1, 2008; 17(3): 265 - 276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Voice and Voice DisordersHome page
V. Pandian, T. T. Nguyen, M. Mirski, and N. I. Bhatti
Percutaneous Tracheostomy: A Multidisciplinary Approach
Voice and Voice Disorders, June 1, 2008; 18(2): 87 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine