Postgrad Med J

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Padmakumar, B
Right arrow Articles by Judd, B A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Padmakumar, B
Right arrow Articles by Judd, B A
Postgraduate Medical Journal 2004;80:424-425
© 2004 Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine


SHORT REPORT

Role of intravenous urogram in investigation of urinary tract infection: an observational study

B Padmakumar 1, H M Carty 2, D A Hughes 1, B A Judd 1

1 Renal Unit, Royal Liverpool Children’s Hospital, Liverpool, UK
2 Department of Radiology, Royal Liverpool Children’s Hospital, Liverpool, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr B Padmakumar
Royal Oldham Hospital, Rochdale Road, Oldham OL12JH, UK; Beena.Padmakumar{at}pat.nhs.uk

Objectives: To examine the value of an intravenous urogram (IVU) in patients with abnormal differential 99mTc dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) uptake without scarring or ultrasound abnormality.

Study design: Forty patients (age 0–19 years) were identified over a two year period in whom the differential renal uptake was >10%, who had smooth renal outlines, and had no evidence of scarring. All patients had an ultrasound examination. Two had marked urological abnormalities on ultrasound and eight had a duplex system in the kidney with greater DMSA uptake. In 18 patients where no explanation was apparent for the discrepant DMSA uptake, an IVU was performed.

Results: Eight patients had a normal IVU. In the remaining 10 patients, six had duplex systems without scarring and four had appearances of scarring in the kidney with reduced DMSA uptake.

Conclusions: In this small selected group an IVU will identify a significant number of patients with normal kidneys, unrecognised simple duplex systems, or scarring where the DMSA scan has been inconclusive. This will help in planning long term follow up.


Abbreviations: DMSA, 99mTc dimercaptosuccinic acid; IVU, intravenous urogram

Keywords: DMSA; discrepant function; urinary tract infection; intravenous urography







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine