Postgrad Med J

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schofield, M L A
Right arrow Articles by Griffiths, P D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schofield, M L A
Right arrow Articles by Griffiths, P D
Postgraduate Medical Journal 2004;80:27-30
© 2004 Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

How well do we investigate patients with suspected subarachnoid haemorrhage? The continuing need for cerebrospinal fluid investigations

M L A Schofield 1, E Lorenz 1, T J Hodgson 1, S Yates 2, P D Griffiths 3

1 Department of Radiology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK
2 Barnsley District Hospital, Barnsley, UK
3 Academic Unit of Radiology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor Paul D Griffiths
Academic Unit of Radiology, Floor C, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK; P.Griffiths{at}Sheffield.ac.uk

Objective: To demonstrate the extent of compliance with established guidelines for the investigation of suspected subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) and the implications of non-compliance.

Design: Prospective observational study of practice in three hospitals in the Trent region.

Setting: One teaching hospital with a tertiary neuroscience referral centre and two large district general hospitals.

Participants: 50 consecutive patients from each centre referred for suspected SAH with negative computed tomography.

Main outcome measures: Diagnosis of SAH confirmed or excluded according to guidelines.

Results: When the data from the three centres were combined (n = 150 computed tomography negative cases) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) investigation was not performed in 60/150 (40%). In the 90 cases where CSF studies were performed SAH was confirmed in 11 (12%).

Conclusion: There is significant non-compliance in following the established guidelines for the investigation of SAH at the centres studied. As the primary cause of non-traumatic SAH is ruptured aneurysm, which is associated with high morbidity and mortality from second haemorrhage, this highlights a major source of concern for clinical governance.


Keywords: subarachnoid haemorrhage; cerebrospinal fluid; lumbar puncture; cranial computed tomography

Abbreviations: CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; SAH, subarachnoid haemorrhage




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
QJMHome page
D.P. Breen, C.W. Duncan, A.E. Pope, A.J. Gray, and R. Al-Shahi Salman
Emergency department evaluation of sudden, severe headache
QJM, June 1, 2008; 101(6): 435 - 443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine