HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Betts, T R Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Betts, T R

Regional survey of temporary transvenous pacing procedures and complications

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Timothy R Betts, Wessex Cardiothoracic Centre, Mailpoint 46, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK;
timbetts{at}compuserve.com

Objective: A prospective regional survey was carried out to describe the current practice of temporary transvenous pacing in five hospitals in the Wessex region and identify factors that predispose to complications.

Methods: Data were collected on patient characteristics, pacing indication and setting, operator grade, training, experience and supervision, venous access, procedure time, duration of pacing, complications, and eventual outcome.

Results: A total of 144 procedures were performed on 111 patients (age 75 (12) years). Median procedure time was 30 (1–150) min. Trainees performed 129 (91.5%) procedures. The senior physician present was a cardiologist/cardiology trainee for 65/144 (45.1%), and had experience of >20 procedures for 81/144 (57.9%). Venous access was by the subclavian in 52 (46.8%), internal jugular in 37 (33.3%) and femoral in 22 (19.8%), requiring multiple stabs or multiple sites in 41(33.1%). Pacing wires remained in place for a median of 2 (0.04–20) days.

Overall procedure times were shorter for cardiologists/cardiology trainees (24[1–90] v 45[10–150] min, p<0.0001), and experienced physicians (30[1–150] v 40[10–120] min, p<0.01). There were 50 complications in 46/144 (31.9%) procedures, affecting 31/111 (27.9%) patients. Immediate complications were less common with experienced physicians (1/81 v 5/59, p<0.05). Infection occurred more often with wires left in situ for >48 hours (17/86 v 2/55, p<0.01) and with longer procedure times (55[8–150] v 30[1–120] min, p<0.005). No factors predicted displacement, which occurred at a median time of 1 (0.04–8) day. Complications delayed permanent pacemaker insertion in 19/63 (22.9%) patients.

Conclusions: Temporary pacemaker insertion is performed by physicians with variable experience and training. The presence of an experienced cardiologist/cardiology trainee and decreasing the time that pacing wires remain in situ may reduce complications.

Keywords: temporary pacing; pacemaker; bradycardia

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Quinn, C. Weston, J. Birkhead, L. Walker, R. Norris, and on behalf of the MINAP Steering Group Redefining the coronary care unit: an observational study of patients admitted to hospital in England and Wales in 2003 QJM, November 1, 2005; 98(11): 797 - 802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Rastan, N. Doll, T. Walther, and F. W. Mohr Pacemaker dependent patients with device infection--a modified approach Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2005; 27(6): 1116 - 1118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]