Postgrad Med J

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karoo, R O S
Right arrow Articles by Robertson, G S R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karoo, R O S
Right arrow Articles by Robertson, G S R
Postgraduate Medical Journal 2003;79:292-294
© 2003 Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine


AUDIT

How valuable is ascitic cytology in the detection and management of malignancy?

R O S Karoo 1, T D R Lloyd 2, G Garcea 2, H D Redway 2, G S R Robertson 3

1 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Plastic Surgery and Burns Unit, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire
2 Leicester General Hospital, Leicester
3 Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Mr T D R Lloyd, Department of Surgery, Secretary’s Office, Old Ward 16, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Road, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK;
tdlloyd{at}ntlworld.com

Introduction: Ascitic cytology is often requested in the early stages of ascitic assessment. A review of this practice in a major English teaching hospital is presented.

Method: Patients were retrospectively identified using the histopathology and patient administration system between January 1999 and May 2001.

Results: Of 276 samples sent for assessment 35 cases were found to be negative when on further review an intra-abdominal malignancy was present. The malignancy was diagnosed using a radiological modality. The sensitivity of ascitic cytology was found to be 60% with 100% specificity. A delay of up to five days could be incurred awaiting the cytology results before further radiological examinations were undertaken.

Conclusion: Too much hope is placed on ascitic cytology to provide the diagnosis at the expense of other investigations. It is recommended that the initial assessment should concentrate on history, examination, and basic tests on ascitic fluid to assess the serum-ascites albumin gradient. Ovarian malignancy is the only tumour type yielding a significant rate of detection from cytology with some prognostic impact. Results should not be awaited before abdominal ultrasound is undertaken. This more directed practice would help reduce unnecessary workload for the pathologist and has resource implications.


Keywords: ascites; cytology; abdominal malignancy




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
Diagnosing intra-abdominal malignancy
J. Clin. Pathol., November 1, 2003; 56(11): 810 - 810.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine