| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
University Division of Transplant Surgery, Leicester General Hospital, UK
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor M L Nicholson, University Division of Transplant Surgery, Leicester General Hospital NHS Trust, Gwendolen Road, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK;
mln2{at}le.ac.uk
Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy has the potential to lessen the burden placed on live kidney donors. This study describes the first British comparison of donor morbidity and recovery following conventional open donor nephrectomy (ODN) and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN).
An initial series of LDN (n=20) was compared to a historical control group of ODN (n=34). Laparoscopic operations were performed via a transperitoneal approach, the kidney being removed through a 6–12 cm Pfannensteil incision. Open operations were performed using a retroperitoneal flank approach with resection of the 12th rib. Postoperatively, donors were managed with a patient controlled analgesia system.
LDN was associated with shorter mean (SD) inpatient stay (6 (2) v 4 (1) days; p=0.0001) and lower parenteral narcotic requirements (morphine 179 (108) v 67 (54) mg; p=0.0001). Laparoscopic donors started driving their cars sooner (2 (1.5) v 6 (4) weeks; p=0.0001) and returned to work more quickly (5 (3) v 12 (6) weeks; p=0.0001) than open nephrectomy donors. There were no differences in recipient serum creatinine levels at three months post-transplant but two recipients of transplant kidneys retrieved laparoscopically (10%) developed ureteric obstruction, whereas this complication did not occur after ODN (p=0.13).
LDN is associated with less postoperative pain and a substantial improvement in donor recovery times. It is not yet clear whether or not the outcome of the recipient kidney transplants are the same after ODN and LDN and much more experience is required before the place of this new technique can be defined.
Keywords: kidney transplantation; laparoscopy; live donor nephrectomy
Abbreviations: LDN, laparoscopic donor nephrectomy; ODN, open donor nephrectomy; PCAS, patient controlled analgesia system
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. A. Schnitzbauer, M. Loss, M. Hornung, G. Glockzin, L. Mantouvalou, B. Kruger, B. K. Kramer, H. J. Schlitt, and A. Obed Mini-incision for strictly retroperitoneal nephrectomy in living kidney donation vs flank incision Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2948 - 2952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. S. Clarke, S. Klarenbach, S. Vlaicu, R. C. Yang, A. X. Garg, and for the Donor Nephrectomy Outcomes Research (DONOR The direct and indirect economic costs incurred by living kidney donors--a systematic review Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2006; 21(7): 1952 - 1960. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Martay, G. Dembo, Y. Vater, K. Charpentier, A. Levy, R. Bakthavatsalam, and P. R. Freund Unexpected surgical difficulties leading to hemorrhage and gas embolus during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a case report: [Difficultes chirurgicales inattendues conduisant a une hemorragie et a une embolie gazeuse pendant une nephrectomie laparoscopique chez un donneur : une etude de cas] Can J Anesth, November 1, 2003; 50(9): 891 - 894. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Hartmann, P. Fauchald, L. Westlie, I. B. Brekke, and H. Holdaas The risk of living kidney donation Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2003; 18(5): 871 - 873. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
